<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Opinion on Iporã Brito Possantti</title><link>https://www.possantti.net/categories/opinion/</link><description>Recent content in Opinion on Iporã Brito Possantti</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.possantti.net/categories/opinion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The era of communication</title><link>https://www.possantti.net/blog/the-era-of-communication/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.possantti.net/blog/the-era-of-communication/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-global-risk"&gt;The global risk&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time, information was a rare resource. Newspapers, TV anchors, and a few specialists told us what was happening. Manipulated? Often. But at the very least, it was &lt;em&gt;curated&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then came smartphones, social media, and the algorithmic machine of chaos. Suddenly, everyone became a broadcaster—from your uncle in the family WhatsApp group to &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ6EYKRoUGM"&gt;youtubers who just discovered the word “hydrology”&lt;/a&gt; or the &lt;a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DLHwU43OUeL/"&gt;councilwoman who believes she understands something about hydraulics&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to argue about the Guaíba</title><link>https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-argue-about-guaiba/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-argue-about-guaiba/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-not-argue-about-guaiba/"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; I evaluated how not to argue about the Guaíba, in the context of the discussion on whether this water body is a river or a lake. Following up, I will now move forward with the basic principles of a rational discussion on the subject, and why I understand the Guaíba to be a &lt;em&gt;lake&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read also: &lt;a href="https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-not-argue-about-guaiba/"&gt;How not to argue about the Guaíba&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;h2 id="deductions-gaúchos-and-controversies"&gt;Deductions, Gaúchos and controversies&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The argumentative fallacies listed in the previous post are wrong because they violate the &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning"&gt;logic of deductive inference&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How not to argue about the Guaíba</title><link>https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-not-argue-about-guaiba/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.possantti.net/blog/how-to-not-argue-about-guaiba/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Rio Grande do Sul is a place with a tradition of fierce polemics and divisions. This reflects the very low communication capacity of its people and should be no point of pride. These controversies have expanded even into scientific and technical aspects, such as the discussion over whether the Guaíba is a river or a lake.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In this case, I hold the opinion that it is a lake.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But before bringing more consistent points regarding this, I find it necessary to prepare the ground by reviewing how not to argue about the Guaíba.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>